Badger InstituteBadger Institute
  • Home
  • Issues
    • Taxes
    • Education
    • Crime & Justice
    • Spending & Accountability
    • Economy & Infrastructure
    • Licensing
    • Healthcare
    • Civil Society
  • Mandate for Madison
  • Research
  • Magazines
    • Diggings
    • Wisconsin Interest
  • Events
  • Media
    • Podcast
    • Fact Sheets
    • Viewpoints
    • Press Releases
    • Badger in the News
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Testimony
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Board of Directors
    • Team
    • Visiting Fellows
    • America’s Future
    • Careers
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Contact Us

Subscribe for Updates

Get the latest news and updates from Badger Institute.

What's New

Wisconsin lawmakers in the dark on broadband

March 16, 2023

The underfunded part of Wisconsin public schooling

March 16, 2023

If we don’t pay for roads, we don’t get mobility

March 9, 2023
Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn Instagram
TRENDING:
  • Wisconsin lawmakers in the dark on broadband
  • The underfunded part of Wisconsin public schooling
  • If we don’t pay for roads, we don’t get mobility
  • Assembly Speaker calls for tolling to fund Wisconsin infrastructure
  • Foreseeing the Future of Wisconsin’s Flat Tax
  • Wisconsin voters will be asked about welfare work requirements
  • A state without convictions
  • Why Wisconsin Needs a Flat Tax and Education Reform
  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Contact
Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn Instagram
Badger InstituteBadger Institute
SUPPORT OUR MISSION
  • Issues
    • Taxes
    • Education
    • Crime & Justice
    • Spending & Accountability
    • Economy & Infrastructure
    • Licensing
    • Healthcare
    • Civil Society
  • Mandate for Madison
  • Research
  • Magazines
    • Diggings
    • Wisconsin Interest
  • Events
  • Media
    • Podcast
    • Fact Sheets
    • Viewpoints
    • Press Releases
    • Badger in the News
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Testimony
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Board of Directors
    • Team
    • Visiting Fellows
    • America’s Future
    • Careers
Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
DONATE
Badger InstituteBadger Institute
Home » Media » News » Sunshine Week: Records request illustrates lack of transparency of federal school funding
Education

Sunshine Week: Records request illustrates lack of transparency of federal school funding

By Dan BensonMarch 16, 2018
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest

It would seem a simple question to ask of any public agency: How much money do you spend and on what?

But when the Badger Institute (formerly the Wisconsin Policy Research Institute) wanted to know about federal funding of school districts around the state, getting answers was more difficult than we imagined.

In summer 2017, the Badger Institute sent a request for information to superintendents in all 424 public school districts in Wisconsin asking for:

  • The number of federally paid full-time equivalent (FTE) workers.
  • The average salary for a federal FTE.
  • The amount of funds expended to match federal dollars.
  • The amount of funds spent as required by federal maintenance of effort (MOE) regulations.
  • How much was paid to an outside auditor to audit the school’s federal grant funds.

These questions were part of the Badger Institute’s Project for 21st Century Federalism, a multi-year effort to gauge the effect of federal grants on state and local spending and policy.

About $824 million flow through the state Department of Public Instruction annually to local school districts in the form of federal grants for programs such as Title I for disadvantaged students, IDEA for special education, school lunches, teacher training, busing and other programs. DPI skims another $54 million or so  to pay for the administration of federal school programs.

Nearly every one of the state’s school districts also employ staff and hire outside accountants and consultants to work under federal programs and ensure that federal regulations are followed.

But no data exists for that cumulative cost. Anecdotal evidence suggests it annually costs taxpayers tens of millions of dollars, if not more, that otherwise could be used to improve classroom outcomes.

The Badger Institute sought to add hard data to those anecdotes.

While many districts promptly provided answers to our queries, many refused to do so because state law does not require the custodians of the information to “create” a record, even if the data involves public spending and is readily available and provided to federal regulators.

“We would need to generate the information and that would not be in the spirit of the open records law,” one superintendent said, with no hint of irony.

Others said they would do so only if the Badger Institute agreed to pay for staff time used to compile the information, often threatening to charge more than $50 an hour, approximately the hourly wage of the schools’ business managers.

“The fact that school districts want $300 and up to find federal spending data is in itself a story,” said one former superintendent, who asked not to be identified. “Charging $350 for information on how tax dollars are spent makes it virtually impossible for school district parents and taxpayers to get information.”

One school business manager who did provide the information said employee records are coded in such a way as to indicate the source of funds that pay their salary and benefits, including federal grants. He was incredulous that a district could not provide salary information regarding school staff paid with federal dollars.

“That’s pretty basic,” he said.

Charging $50 an hour or more would seem to contravene the Wisconsin Attorney General’s open records compliance guide (page 63), which states: “Generally, the rate for an actual, necessary, and direct charge for staff time should be based on the pay rate of the lowest paid employee capable of performing the task.”

Some district officials directed the Badger Institute to forms the district had already completed as part of the federal Civil Rights Data Collection, which was completed in the spring of 2017 but not yet publicly available. Many other districts inexplicably refused to do so.

Some districts claimed the information simply did not exist and that not even staff or their own school board knew the details of how federal funding affected their districts.

“We don’t keep an inventory of (federal) grants,” a lawyer with one large northeast Wisconsin school district said. She explained that grants received by the district — and their associated labor, matching or maintenance of effort costs — are listed as line items in departmental budgets and are not provided in a consolidated list to school board members or anyone else. “Doing so would require a significant amount of time,” she said.

Maintenance of effort refers to the requirement that a school district maintain its level of spending on a program, such as special education, while receiving federal funds. The requirement is meant to ensure that federal dollars supplement but not supplant local and state funding. State and local officials often complain, however, that the rules restrict their ability to respond to changing budget priorities.

In the end, 259 of the 424 districts queried largely complied with the request. Of those who responded:

  • 3,826 FTEs worked under federal programs, earning $13.4 million, or an average of $52,000 annually.
  • $1.36 billion were spent in federally required matching and maintenance of effort costs.
  • Districts paid $662,565, or an average per district of $2,558, to an outside firm to audit its use of federal grant monies.

The difficulty in collecting the information points to a fundamental problem with the federal grants-in-aid system that transfers more than $700 billion to the states and accounts for nearly one-third of all states’ spending.

Critics of the system charge that it obscures spending, focuses on compliance rather than outcomes and diffuses responsibility. Among them is Chris Edwards, director of tax policy studies at the Cato Institute in Washington, D.C., and editor of www.downsizinggovernment.org.

“The (grant) system is a complicated mess, and it is getting worse all the time,” he said.

Dan Benson is editor of the Badger Institute’s Project for 21st Century Federalism.

News
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Dan Benson

Related Posts

Wisconsin lawmakers in the dark on broadband

March 16, 2023

The underfunded part of Wisconsin public schooling

March 16, 2023

Assembly Speaker calls for tolling to fund Wisconsin infrastructure

March 2, 2023
Categories
Top Posts

Local pols filling old budget holes with massive COVID aid

December 8, 20221,449

This is not four years ago

November 10, 20221,287

A state without convictions

January 12, 2023644

Billions in federal spending in Wisconsin unaudited; results never measured

November 9, 2022488
Archives

Sign Up for Top Picks

Our weekly e-Newsletter with the latest items and updates

Connect with Badger Institute
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
About Us
About Us

The Badger Institute is a nonpartisan, not-for-profit institute established in 1987 working to engage and energize Wisconsinites and others in discussions and timely action on key public policy issues critical to the state’s future, growth and prosperity.

Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube LinkedIn

Sign Up for Top Picks

Our weekly e-Newsletter with the latest items and updates

What’s New

Wisconsin lawmakers in the dark on broadband

March 16, 2023

The underfunded part of Wisconsin public schooling

March 16, 2023

If we don’t pay for roads, we don’t get mobility

March 9, 2023

Assembly Speaker calls for tolling to fund Wisconsin infrastructure

March 2, 2023
© 2023 Badger Institute | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Sitemap

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

This site uses functional cookies and external scripts to improve your experience.

Privacy settings

Privacy Settings

This site uses functional cookies and external scripts to improve your experience. Which cookies and scripts are used and how they impact your visit is specified on the left. You may change your settings at any time. Your choices will not impact your visit.

NOTE: These settings will only apply to the browser and device you are currently using.

CRM Software

Customer Relationship Management Software

Google Analytics

Google Analytics is a web analytics service offered by Google that tracks and reports website traffic. Google uses the data collected to track and monitor the use of our Service. This data is shared with other Google services. Google may use the collected data to contextualize and personalize the ads of its own advertising network.

You can opt-out of having made your activity on the Service available to Google Analytics by installing the Google Analytics opt-out browser add-on. The add-on prevents the Google Analytics JavaScript (ga.js, analytics.js, and dc.js) from sharing information with Google Analytics about visits activity.

For more information on the privacy practices of Google, please visit the Google Privacy & Terms web page: https://policies.google.com/privacy?hl=en

Powered by Cookie Information