Badger InstituteBadger Institute
  • Home
  • Issues
    • Taxes
    • Education
    • Crime & Justice
    • Spending & Accountability
    • Economy & Infrastructure
    • Federalism
    • Licensing
    • Healthcare
    • Civil Society
  • Mandate for Madison
  • Research
  • Magazines
    • Diggings
    • Wisconsin Interest
  • Events
  • Media
    • Podcast
    • Fact Sheets
    • Viewpoints
    • Press Releases
    • Badger in the News
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Testimony
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Board of Directors
    • Team
    • Visiting Fellows
    • America’s Future
    • Careers
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Contact Us

Subscribe for Updates

Get the latest news and updates from Badger Institute.

What's New

Latest crime figures show a Milwaukee in trouble

March 23, 2023

Wisconsin lawmakers in the dark on broadband

March 16, 2023

The underfunded part of Wisconsin public schooling

March 16, 2023
Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn Instagram
TRENDING:
  • Latest crime figures show a Milwaukee in trouble
  • Wisconsin lawmakers in the dark on broadband
  • The underfunded part of Wisconsin public schooling
  • If we don’t pay for roads, we don’t get mobility
  • Foreseeing the Future of Wisconsin’s Flat Tax
  • Wisconsin voters will be asked about welfare work requirements
  • A state without convictions
  • Why Wisconsin Needs a Flat Tax and Education Reform
  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Contact
Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn Instagram
Badger InstituteBadger Institute
SUPPORT OUR MISSION
  • Issues
    • Taxes
    • Education
    • Crime & Justice
    • Spending & Accountability
    • Economy & Infrastructure
    • Federalism
    • Licensing
    • Healthcare
    • Civil Society
  • Mandate for Madison
  • Research
  • Magazines
    • Diggings
    • Wisconsin Interest
  • Events
  • Media
    • Podcast
    • Fact Sheets
    • Viewpoints
    • Press Releases
    • Badger in the News
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Testimony
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Board of Directors
    • Team
    • Visiting Fellows
    • America’s Future
    • Careers
Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
DONATE
Badger InstituteBadger Institute
Home » Education » Beyond the Ivory Tower
Education

Beyond the Ivory Tower

By Charles Sorensen & Michael FlahertyMay 1, 2015
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest

How to get the UW System more involved in ground-level economic development.

An enormous political controversy is swirling around how the University of Wisconsin System and its 26 campuses are funded and managed. Will the system in any way be allowed to operate independently of the Legislature and the executive branch? At what level should taxpayers fund the system, with its 180,000 students and almost 6,900 faculty members?  

But there’s a broader issue that is, by most measures, far more important to Wisconsin’s future: how to expand the campuses’ role in helping build the state’s economy.  

This is not a new or partisan concern. University involvement in the state’s economic well-being is a found- ing principle of the Wisconsin Idea — a term coined in the late 19th and early 20th century. The system’s mission explicitly includes extending “knowledge and its application beyond the boundaries of its campuses.”  

The largest campuses in Milwaukee and Madison, the two that award virtually all of the UW System’s doctoral degrees, traditionally have been the most focused on this. But the other 11 four-year campuses are also specifically charged with supporting “activities designed to promote the economic development of the state” — an oft-overlooked fact. 

Composed of 13 four-year universities, 13 two-year campuses and the statewide UW-Extension, the UW System has an annual all-funds budget of more $6.1 billion — including over $1.2 billion from state taxpayers. 

Including private and federal research dollars as well as tech college spending, Wisconsin ranks ninth in total higher education spending per capita — an enormous investment for a state that is lagging in job creation and below average in both the percentage of the population with bachelor’s degrees and per capita income.  

The tools that the UW campuses require to better fulfill their mission to foster economic growth are dramatic in scope and simple in principle.  

Economic development is inherently a local and regional challenge. The 13 four-year campuses serve every community in the state. Chancellors know their faculties’ strengths; they know their regions’ businesses and industries; they know their regions’ economic development needs. To succeed, chancellors require managerial flexibility to build campus efforts and facilities to meet those needs. That means creating classroom and internship experiences that their local markets demand, providing the applied research to help solve problems and develop new products and systems, and deploying faculty and resources for the professional outreach and economic assistance their regions require.  

Success in economic development statewide means thousands of ideas, partnerships and cooperative efforts, none of which can be created or managed very well from Madison.  

The cultural and managerial changes this would require are enormous. Currently, the UW System is run as a top-down system with key managerial and leadership decisions made in Madison by the UW System, the UW Board of Regents, the state Department of Administration and elected officials. The system’s managerial culture is bureaucratic, risk-averse and very slow. That discourages creative problem-solving and innovative thinking on campuses. It hinders the development of business-faculty partnerships and facilities to address and solve problems and create new products and businesses. In some areas, it halts creative thinking altogether, as the system’s bureaucratic weight is simply too burdensome to overcome.  

Ironically, none of the options recently batted about — including the creation of a public authority — addresses the problems with that top-down culture. The solution is not to replace one central authority with another one. What is truly needed is a localized form of oversight — local boards of directors — overseeing each campus.  

The regents and the system must remain important partners. They must play the critical roles of hiring chancellors, laying out goals and expectations for success and, most importantly, holding chancellors accountable. Regents and the system should provide centralized management systems, such as payroll and information technology, and they should retain a partnership stake in ensuring basic coordination of missions among the campuses. (The state doesn’t need four medical schools, for example.) They should help campuses form clusters of excellence in which specialized faculty from several campuses can pool their resources and expertise.  

But if the regents, the system and the Legislature truly value entrepreneurial management of the campuses, it can be done only if individual chancellors are allowed to manage entrepreneurially. In sum, they need more flexibility in how they manage and raise revenue and must also be held accountable for outcomes — i.e., specific successes or failures. They should be given the latitude to function more as chief executive officers and less like provosts.  

More specifically, in order to help the UW System better fulfill its mission to help produce economic development, elected officials and regents should:  

  • Decentralize control over key management areas, including capital projects — especially those built with private funds or cooperatively funded projects such as laboratories. This in turn would provide campuses more authority over their fee-funded projects to improve the efficiency of the construction process.  
  • Give individual campuses more latitude to create and expand popular programs that engage students and professors in tech-transfer and second-stage economic development. Similarly, give them the authority to eliminate programs with little market demand or academic value.  
  • Reform shared governance. More precisely, define the academic role of faculty management and the role of chancellors, deans and the system in managing the campuses.  
  • Expand criteria for granting tenure and compensation and further study how and when tenure is used. Review faculty tenure every 10 years to ensure that faculty members are still pursuing their research, academic and, where appropriate, tech-transfer and business missions.  
  • Protect basic research.  
  • Give chancellors (with oversight) broader authority over faculty, hiring and compensation on their campuses.  
  • Establish a formula under which each campus contributes a part of its tuition dollars to the system for equalization purposes and to fund programs requiring special subsidies. But allow chancellors the ability to set the price of their campus’ tuition — including tuition for high-cost/high-value programs.  
  • Give local campuses expanded latitude to attract private investment and convince local businesses and investment of the potential return on that investment.  
  • Set up firm, objective metrics that can be used to measure the economic impact of each campus and to hold chancellors accountable.  
  • Invest in regional communications efforts to help build relationships with local business leaders, taxpayers, critics and others.  
  • Appoint a local board of directors for each campus. This would be done by regents, the governor and local leaders. Boards would include local business leaders.  
  • Ensure that local boards are holding chancellors accountable for success by providing campuses with systemwide standards to set goals and measure performance.
Download REport
UWsystemsorensenmay2015vol28no2Download
Reports
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Charles Sorensen & Michael Flaherty

Related Posts

The underfunded part of Wisconsin public schooling

March 16, 2023

Amid illiteracy, where was the urgency?

February 23, 2023

Family finds education freedom a “godsend”

February 16, 2023
Categories
Top Posts

Local pols filling old budget holes with massive COVID aid

December 8, 20221,454

This is not four years ago

November 10, 20221,287

A state without convictions

January 12, 2023647

Billions in federal spending in Wisconsin unaudited; results never measured

November 9, 2022491
Archives

Sign Up for Top Picks

Our weekly e-Newsletter with the latest items and updates

Connect with Badger Institute
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
About Us
About Us

The Badger Institute is a nonpartisan, not-for-profit institute established in 1987 working to engage and energize Wisconsinites and others in discussions and timely action on key public policy issues critical to the state’s future, growth and prosperity.

Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube LinkedIn

Sign Up for Top Picks

Our weekly e-Newsletter with the latest items and updates

What’s New

Latest crime figures show a Milwaukee in trouble

March 23, 2023

Wisconsin lawmakers in the dark on broadband

March 16, 2023

The underfunded part of Wisconsin public schooling

March 16, 2023

If we don’t pay for roads, we don’t get mobility

March 9, 2023
© 2023 Badger Institute | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Sitemap

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

This site uses functional cookies and external scripts to improve your experience.

Privacy settings

Privacy Settings

This site uses functional cookies and external scripts to improve your experience. Which cookies and scripts are used and how they impact your visit is specified on the left. You may change your settings at any time. Your choices will not impact your visit.

NOTE: These settings will only apply to the browser and device you are currently using.

CRM Software

Customer Relationship Management Software

Google Analytics

Google Analytics is a web analytics service offered by Google that tracks and reports website traffic. Google uses the data collected to track and monitor the use of our Service. This data is shared with other Google services. Google may use the collected data to contextualize and personalize the ads of its own advertising network.

You can opt-out of having made your activity on the Service available to Google Analytics by installing the Google Analytics opt-out browser add-on. The add-on prevents the Google Analytics JavaScript (ga.js, analytics.js, and dc.js) from sharing information with Google Analytics about visits activity.

For more information on the privacy practices of Google, please visit the Google Privacy & Terms web page: https://policies.google.com/privacy?hl=en

Powered by Cookie Information