Close Menu
Badger InstituteBadger Institute
  • Home
  • Issues
    • Taxes
    • Education
    • Housing
    • Crime & Justice
    • Spending & Accountability
    • Economy & Infrastructure
    • Federalism
    • Licensing
    • Healthcare
    • Childcare
    • Marijuana
    • Energy
    • Civil Society
  • Mandate for Madison
  • Research
  • News & Analysis
    • News & Analysis
    • Viewpoints (Op-ed)
    • By the Numbers
    • Fact Sheets
    • Magazines
      • Diggings
      • Wisconsin Interest
  • Media
    • Badger in the News
    • Press Releases
    • Podcast
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Testimony
  • Events
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Board of Directors
    • Team
    • Visiting Fellows
    • Careers
  • Top Picks
  • Donate
  • Contact Us

Subscribe to Top Picks

Get the latest news and research from Badger Institute

Name(Required)
You can modify your subscription preferences at any time by using the link found at the bottom of every email.

What's New

At center of America’s essential debate, Johnson says resist spending frenzy

June 5, 2025

Real answer to siting nuclear plants: ‘Yes, here.’

June 5, 2025

Taxpayers need more simplicity and transparency — not misleading arguments meant to stoke fears of successful choice schools

May 29, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn Instagram
TRENDING:
  • At center of America’s essential debate, Johnson says resist spending frenzy
  • Real answer to siting nuclear plants: ‘Yes, here.’
  • Taxpayers need more simplicity and transparency — not misleading arguments meant to stoke fears of successful choice schools
  • Plans, zoning and annexation form front lines for Wisconsin cities looking to build more housing
  • We increasingly live in a world of unsolved crime
  • State should cut funding to public media
  • Kewaunee power possibility adds to Wisconsin nuclear trend
  • Taxpayers spared nearly $8.5 million in Wisconsin alone due to Trump administration order cutting aid to public broadcasting
  • Donate
  • Events
  • Contact
Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn Instagram
Badger InstituteBadger Institute
SUPPORT OUR MISSION
  • Issues
    • Taxes
    • Education
    • Housing
    • Crime & Justice
    • Spending & Accountability
    • Economy & Infrastructure
    • Federalism
    • Licensing
    • Healthcare
    • Childcare
    • Marijuana
    • Energy
    • Civil Society
  • Mandate for Madison
  • Research
  • News & Analysis
    • News & Analysis
    • Viewpoints (Op-ed)
    • By the Numbers
    • Fact Sheets
    • Magazines
      • Diggings
      • Wisconsin Interest
  • Media
    • Press Releases
    • Badger in the News
    • Podcast
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Testimony
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Board of Directors
    • Team
    • Visiting Fellows
    • Careers
Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
DONATE
Badger InstituteBadger Institute
Home » Education » Badger Institute testimony for AB 1 (2025)
Education

Badger Institute testimony for AB 1 (2025)

By Badger InstituteFebruary 6, 2025
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest

The following testimony related to academic standards for Wisconsin schoolchildren was submitted to the Assembly Committee on Education on Feb. 6, 2025.


Feb. 6, 2025
ASSEMBLY BILL 1

Chairman Kitchens and Assembly Education Committee Members,

Thank you for hearing Assembly Bill 1, legislation designed to return Wisconsin’s academic standards to the high levels from which they were lowered by Superintendent Jill Underly and the staff at the Department of Public Instruction. 

Like everyone, we shared the same reaction as Governor Evers when we were surprised by the drastic changes revealed just prior to the required release of the data.

The DPI’s actions lowered cut scores, detached our standards from NAEP proficiency levels, and modified the tests in ways that render comparisons to previous testing data impossible. In short, the changes force Wisconsin to start over with education data after lowering the bar.

An example from the results of the DPI’s Forward exam and from the just-released NAEP tests illustrate the problem. 

In Wisconsin statewide, among 4th-graders in 2022, 44.8% were found to be proficient at reading. The most recent results show 52.1% proficient, or “meeting,” as the relabeled category is called. That’s a 16% improvement. 

But the NAEP test of Wisconsin 4th-graders found in 2022 that 33% were proficient in reading in 2022, and 31% are proficient now, a 6% drop. 

Among 4th-graders in Milwaukee, the DPI in 2022 found that 17.2% were proficient in reading, while in 2024, 22.2% were — a 29% improvement. NAEP, however, found that in 2022, 12% of Milwaukee 4th-graders were proficient in reading, while in 2024, only 9% were — a 25% drop. 

Which is correct? The DPI’s flawed standard-setting process make its results uselessly unreliable — indeed, the DPI says we can’t even compare the latest figures to previous ones. How are policymakers and parents to judge the results?

While this bill is focused on restoring previous, higher standards, much of the problem with the lowering of our standards was the process used in making the changes. Done entirely within the walls of the DPI by staff and an advisory group whose members were required to sign non-disclosure agreements, dozens of significant policy changes were made without anyone on this committee having a voice in the decisions.

While not all the changes made to Wisconsin’s testing paradigm and statewide report cards are addressed in this bill, we support the goal of realigning our standards with NAEP, of using common sense language for describing the levels of proficiency, and of setting higher expectations for our kids.

We hope this hearing is the beginning of a process that results in changes to both our standards and the process we use to change them.

Submit a comment

"*" indicates required fields

Your name*
0 of 10000 max characters

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Badger Institute

Related Posts

Taxpayers need more simplicity and transparency — not misleading arguments meant to stoke fears of successful choice schools

May 29, 2025

Subject by subject, Wisconsin districts face higher rates of teacher turnover

May 1, 2025

Kinser DPI victory would alter decades-long trend

March 27, 2025
Top Posts

‘Predictable’ Hobart a rarity for developers in Wisconsin

March 20, 20251,898

Policy Brief: Could Wisconsin eliminate its income tax?

September 12, 20241,823

Manitowoc and builder bend to make houses attainable

April 24, 20251,422

Subject by subject, Wisconsin districts face higher rates of teacher turnover

May 1, 20251,036

Top Picks

Subscribe for the latest news and research from Badger Institute

Name(Required)
You can modify your subscription preferences at any time by using the link found at the bottom of every email.

Connect with Badger Institute
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
About Us
About Us

The Badger Institute is a nonpartisan, not-for-profit institute established in 1987 working to engage and energize Wisconsinites and others in discussions and timely action on key public policy issues critical to the state’s future, growth and prosperity.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn

Sign up for Top Picks

Get the latest news and research from Badger Institute

Name(Required)
You can modify your subscription preferences at any time by using the link found at the bottom of every email.

What’s New

At center of America’s essential debate, Johnson says resist spending frenzy

June 5, 2025

Real answer to siting nuclear plants: ‘Yes, here.’

June 5, 2025

Taxpayers need more simplicity and transparency — not misleading arguments meant to stoke fears of successful choice schools

May 29, 2025

Plans, zoning and annexation form front lines for Wisconsin cities looking to build more housing

May 22, 2025
© 2025 Badger Institute | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Sitemap

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Notifications