Badger InstituteBadger Institute
  • Home
  • Issues
    • Taxes
    • Education
    • Crime & Justice
    • Spending & Accountability
    • Economy & Infrastructure
    • Licensing
    • Healthcare
    • Civil Society
  • Mandate for Madison
  • Research
  • Magazines
    • Diggings
    • Wisconsin Interest
  • Events
  • Media
    • Podcast
    • Fact Sheets
    • Viewpoints
    • Press Releases
    • Badger in the News
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Testimony
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Board of Directors
    • Team
    • Visiting Fellows
    • America’s Future
    • Careers
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Contact Us

Subscribe for Updates

Get the latest news and updates from Badger Institute.

What's New

Wisconsin lawmakers in the dark on broadband

March 16, 2023

The underfunded part of Wisconsin public schooling

March 16, 2023

If we don’t pay for roads, we don’t get mobility

March 9, 2023
Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn Instagram
TRENDING:
  • Wisconsin lawmakers in the dark on broadband
  • The underfunded part of Wisconsin public schooling
  • If we don’t pay for roads, we don’t get mobility
  • Assembly Speaker calls for tolling to fund Wisconsin infrastructure
  • Foreseeing the Future of Wisconsin’s Flat Tax
  • Wisconsin voters will be asked about welfare work requirements
  • A state without convictions
  • Why Wisconsin Needs a Flat Tax and Education Reform
  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Contact
Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn Instagram
Badger InstituteBadger Institute
SUPPORT OUR MISSION
  • Issues
    • Taxes
    • Education
    • Crime & Justice
    • Spending & Accountability
    • Economy & Infrastructure
    • Licensing
    • Healthcare
    • Civil Society
  • Mandate for Madison
  • Research
  • Magazines
    • Diggings
    • Wisconsin Interest
  • Events
  • Media
    • Podcast
    • Fact Sheets
    • Viewpoints
    • Press Releases
    • Badger in the News
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Testimony
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Board of Directors
    • Team
    • Visiting Fellows
    • America’s Future
    • Careers
Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
DONATE
Badger InstituteBadger Institute
Home » Education » What Joint Finance Missed on Education
Education

What Joint Finance Missed on Education

By Mike FordJune 10, 2013
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest

What was the most surprising part of the education package passed by the Joint Committee on Finance? 

Was it the rejection of a statewide special needs voucher program?  No.  That issue seemed early on to be lost in the broader voucher expansion discussion. 

Was it the increase in per-pupil revenue limits to public schools?  No.  The Senate in particular was upset about the lack of a public school funding increase; the addition of more funds for public schools was inevitable.

Was it the rejection of the new state charter school board?  Nope.  From the beginning, the charter board appeared to have no legislative champion. 

The most stunning action by the committee was the complete rejection of the underlying concept behind Governor Walker’s original education budget: Tying new money to performance. 

Though operationally flawed, Walker’s original budget was philosophically consistent. 

Walker proposed a categorical aid tied to school performance on the new state report cards in lieu of increasing public school revenue limits.  The idea was that public schools would only receive additional revenue if they were performing.  Walker’s position was a complete sea change from the historical precedent of increasing public funding roughly at the rate of inflation.  This sea change was flatly rejected by Joint Finance. 

Walker proposed limiting a new voucher program only to large districts where two or more schools scored in the two lowest categories on DPI’s new report cards.  Instead, the committee passed an extremely limited statewide voucher program for a small number of low-income pupils.  The performance of a public school or district a child attends has nothing to do with his or her voucher eligibility.

Similarly the aforementioned charter school board was to be empowered to approve entities that could authorize schools only in districts where two or more public schools scored in the lowest categories on the state report cards.  Instead, the Joint Committee on Finance did almost nothing on the charter-authorizer front.                 

On most of the issues the Joint Committee on Finance made the right call.  The school report cards are an imperfect instrument that will be forced to change significantly when the state dumps the current Wisconsin Knowledge and Concepts Exam in favor of a new test.  Tying any long-term policy innovation to a report card in existence for just one year would have been a mistake. 

Further, tying charter and voucher eligibly to failing schools implies that these programs are life-raft policies rather than education reforms.  The premise of such a proposal is that a student is guaranteed to automatically be better off using a voucher or attending a charter school.  History in Wisconsin and elsewhere shows this is not the case.  More importantly, charters and vouchers will never become mainstream public education policies if they are used to punish school districts.

It is unfortunate that the idea of a school performance fund went nowhere.  Why not reward successful schools with additional resources by which to continue and strengthen their success?  I do wonder if this proposal could have found success if it was paired with a modest increase in per-pupil revenue limits to being with.  But, unwisely, it was not. 

Of course it is too early to conclude that Walker’s shift towards a funding-for-performance education model is dead.  The budget still faces the full Assembly and Senate, as well as the Governor’s own powerful veto pen.  And even if this budget remains as is, do not be shocked if these proposals resurface two years down the road, at the very least their inclusion in the executive budget makes them fair game for future discussion.   

News
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Mike Ford

Related Posts

Wisconsin lawmakers in the dark on broadband

March 16, 2023

The underfunded part of Wisconsin public schooling

March 16, 2023

Assembly Speaker calls for tolling to fund Wisconsin infrastructure

March 2, 2023
Categories
Top Posts

Local pols filling old budget holes with massive COVID aid

December 8, 20221,449

This is not four years ago

November 10, 20221,287

A state without convictions

January 12, 2023644

Billions in federal spending in Wisconsin unaudited; results never measured

November 9, 2022488
Archives

Sign Up for Top Picks

Our weekly e-Newsletter with the latest items and updates

Connect with Badger Institute
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
About Us
About Us

The Badger Institute is a nonpartisan, not-for-profit institute established in 1987 working to engage and energize Wisconsinites and others in discussions and timely action on key public policy issues critical to the state’s future, growth and prosperity.

Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube LinkedIn

Sign Up for Top Picks

Our weekly e-Newsletter with the latest items and updates

What’s New

Wisconsin lawmakers in the dark on broadband

March 16, 2023

The underfunded part of Wisconsin public schooling

March 16, 2023

If we don’t pay for roads, we don’t get mobility

March 9, 2023

Assembly Speaker calls for tolling to fund Wisconsin infrastructure

March 2, 2023
© 2023 Badger Institute | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Sitemap

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

This site uses functional cookies and external scripts to improve your experience.

Privacy settings

Privacy Settings

This site uses functional cookies and external scripts to improve your experience. Which cookies and scripts are used and how they impact your visit is specified on the left. You may change your settings at any time. Your choices will not impact your visit.

NOTE: These settings will only apply to the browser and device you are currently using.

CRM Software

Customer Relationship Management Software

Google Analytics

Google Analytics is a web analytics service offered by Google that tracks and reports website traffic. Google uses the data collected to track and monitor the use of our Service. This data is shared with other Google services. Google may use the collected data to contextualize and personalize the ads of its own advertising network.

You can opt-out of having made your activity on the Service available to Google Analytics by installing the Google Analytics opt-out browser add-on. The add-on prevents the Google Analytics JavaScript (ga.js, analytics.js, and dc.js) from sharing information with Google Analytics about visits activity.

For more information on the privacy practices of Google, please visit the Google Privacy & Terms web page: https://policies.google.com/privacy?hl=en

Powered by Cookie Information