Badger InstituteBadger Institute
  • Home
  • Issues
    • Taxes
    • Education
    • Crime & Justice
    • Spending & Accountability
    • Economy & Infrastructure
    • Federalism
    • Licensing
    • Healthcare
    • Civil Society
  • Mandate for Madison
  • Research
  • Magazines
    • Diggings
    • Wisconsin Interest
  • Events
  • Media
    • Podcast
    • Fact Sheets
    • Viewpoints
    • Press Releases
    • Badger in the News
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Testimony
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Board of Directors
    • Team
    • Visiting Fellows
    • America’s Future
    • Careers
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Contact Us

Subscribe for Updates

Get the latest news and updates from Badger Institute.

What's New

Latest crime figures show a Milwaukee in trouble

March 23, 2023

Wisconsin lawmakers in the dark on broadband

March 16, 2023

The underfunded part of Wisconsin public schooling

March 16, 2023
Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn Instagram
TRENDING:
  • Latest crime figures show a Milwaukee in trouble
  • Wisconsin lawmakers in the dark on broadband
  • The underfunded part of Wisconsin public schooling
  • If we don’t pay for roads, we don’t get mobility
  • Foreseeing the Future of Wisconsin’s Flat Tax
  • Wisconsin voters will be asked about welfare work requirements
  • A state without convictions
  • Why Wisconsin Needs a Flat Tax and Education Reform
  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Contact
Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn Instagram
Badger InstituteBadger Institute
SUPPORT OUR MISSION
  • Issues
    • Taxes
    • Education
    • Crime & Justice
    • Spending & Accountability
    • Economy & Infrastructure
    • Federalism
    • Licensing
    • Healthcare
    • Civil Society
  • Mandate for Madison
  • Research
  • Magazines
    • Diggings
    • Wisconsin Interest
  • Events
  • Media
    • Podcast
    • Fact Sheets
    • Viewpoints
    • Press Releases
    • Badger in the News
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Testimony
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Board of Directors
    • Team
    • Visiting Fellows
    • America’s Future
    • Careers
Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
DONATE
Badger InstituteBadger Institute
Home » Presidential Deafness
Culture/Politics

Presidential Deafness

By Badger InstituteJuly 5, 2010
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest

Recently, a liberal friend suggested that I read President Obama’s “nuanced and thoughtful defense of government” at the University of Michigan’s recent commencement ceremony. I bit and found it instructive, although not in the way in which my friend intended.

The president’s point of departure is a question posed to him by a kindergartener in Virginia: “Are people being nice?”

No, the president responded, they most certainly are not. While allowing that politics has never been a beanbag, he reprises his earlier observations about why the benighted “cling to God and guns.” People (by which he means opponents of his administration’s policies) get “riled up” because of “change” apparently including the need to “live and work with more people who don’t look like you or think like you or come from where you do.”

It is, for the president, so sad. But the president suggests two ways in which our political discourse might improve.

The first — and presumably most important — is to appreciate what government can do for us. We ought not to be overly attached to the conception of government set forth in our founding documents. American democracy has thrived, in his view, because government has helped us adapt to changing times.

While nodding in the direction of a “limited” state, the president tells us that sine qua non of improved political discourse is to know that the “government is us.” It is “we, the People.”

Citing Theodore Roosevelt, he observes that the purpose of the government is as broad as “the general welfare” of the people. He calls on us to stop debating about whether we should have “big government” or “small government.”

That debate, he implies, is so 1789. We should limit ourselves to a discussion of how government can be “smarter and better.” We should, like the characters in Dr. Strangelove, learn to stop worrying and love the Leviathan.

There is much to say about this. We do elect those who make the laws. In that sense, government is, at least, a plurality of “us.” But modern public choice theorists — and James Madison before them — have warned of  the ways in which political processes tend to be hijacked by the especially interested. Friedrich Hayek demonstrated that no single entity can “know enough” to order society.

Even the president acknowledges that skepticism of government is in our national DNA, although he seems to regard this as an increasingly unfortunate residue of our national evolution.

Thus, we have traditionally carved out areas of individual liberty and placed structural limitations on the exercise of government power. Beyond such constitutional limitations, much of the opposition to the Obama agenda reflects the fact that many of “us” are not happy with what “we, the government” is up to.

We can all agree with the president’s observation that not all government is “inherently bad.” But in rejecting, as he is so fond of saying, the false choice between no government and limitless government, he misses the real choice. He quotes Abraham Lincoln’s observation that “the role of government is to do for the people what they cannot do better for themselves.”

The “change” that has so upset the public — what has created, in Michael Tomasky’s words, the first “right-wing street-protest movement” in our history — is the president’s rather capacious view of what government can do better than the people themselves.

It is a reaction to an unprecedented peacetime increase in the size of the federal budget, state ownership of iconic American corporations, and substantial federalization of the provision of health care. It is collective disgust at a stimulus package that was turned into a riot of pent-up demand for Democratic Party gewgaws and indulgences without evident economic impact.

This is the debate we are having. It is very much about “big government” and “small government.” While the president says that this debate “doesn’t really fit the times in which we live,” many of “us” do not agree.

Even the president’s humor reflects an inability — or unwillingness — to see that the issue is not simply whether government is bad, but whether government ought to be doing what he wants it to do.

He is amused by a sign that said “Keep Your Government Hands Out of My Medicare!” For him this is irrational. It is essentially saying “Keep Government Out of My Government-Run Health Care Plan.”

So it does. But it says something else as well. The Obama health plan proposes substantially increased government involvement in managing the standards of care for Medicare patients.

It is one thing to say that government — which is very good at transferring money from one pocket to another — ought to help senior citizens pay for their health care. It is quite another to believe that the federal government can “bend the cost curve” by attempting to determine — for everyone and everywhere — what forms of care are cost effective.

That was a clumsy sign (we can assume its author did not make the Harvard Law Review), but maybe a more nuanced message than the president is willing to allow.
In his University of Michigan address, he went on to suggest that we listen to the other side and that we participate in civic affairs. Good advice — for both inside and outside the Beltway.

Richard Esenberg, a visiting professor of law at Marquette University, blogs at Shark and Shepherd.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Badger Institute

Related Posts

Assembly Speaker calls for tolling to fund Wisconsin infrastructure

March 2, 2023

Foreseeing the Future of Wisconsin’s Flat Tax

March 2, 2023

Another Reason, Governor, to Cut Those Top Tax Rates

February 20, 2023
Categories
Top Posts

Local pols filling old budget holes with massive COVID aid

December 8, 20221,452

This is not four years ago

November 10, 20221,287

A state without convictions

January 12, 2023645

Billions in federal spending in Wisconsin unaudited; results never measured

November 9, 2022491
Archives

Sign Up for Top Picks

Our weekly e-Newsletter with the latest items and updates

Connect with Badger Institute
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
About Us
About Us

The Badger Institute is a nonpartisan, not-for-profit institute established in 1987 working to engage and energize Wisconsinites and others in discussions and timely action on key public policy issues critical to the state’s future, growth and prosperity.

Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube LinkedIn

Sign Up for Top Picks

Our weekly e-Newsletter with the latest items and updates

What’s New

Latest crime figures show a Milwaukee in trouble

March 23, 2023

Wisconsin lawmakers in the dark on broadband

March 16, 2023

The underfunded part of Wisconsin public schooling

March 16, 2023

If we don’t pay for roads, we don’t get mobility

March 9, 2023
© 2023 Badger Institute | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Sitemap

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

This site uses functional cookies and external scripts to improve your experience.

Privacy settings

Privacy Settings

This site uses functional cookies and external scripts to improve your experience. Which cookies and scripts are used and how they impact your visit is specified on the left. You may change your settings at any time. Your choices will not impact your visit.

NOTE: These settings will only apply to the browser and device you are currently using.

CRM Software

Customer Relationship Management Software

Google Analytics

Google Analytics is a web analytics service offered by Google that tracks and reports website traffic. Google uses the data collected to track and monitor the use of our Service. This data is shared with other Google services. Google may use the collected data to contextualize and personalize the ads of its own advertising network.

You can opt-out of having made your activity on the Service available to Google Analytics by installing the Google Analytics opt-out browser add-on. The add-on prevents the Google Analytics JavaScript (ga.js, analytics.js, and dc.js) from sharing information with Google Analytics about visits activity.

For more information on the privacy practices of Google, please visit the Google Privacy & Terms web page: https://policies.google.com/privacy?hl=en

Powered by Cookie Information