Badger InstituteBadger Institute
  • Home
  • Issues
    • Taxes
    • Education
    • Crime & Justice
    • Spending & Accountability
    • Economy & Infrastructure
    • Federalism
    • Licensing
    • Healthcare
    • Civil Society
  • Mandate for Madison
  • Research
  • Magazines
    • Diggings
    • Wisconsin Interest
  • Events
  • Media
    • Podcast
    • Fact Sheets
    • Viewpoints
    • Press Releases
    • Badger in the News
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Testimony
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Board of Directors
    • Team
    • Visiting Fellows
    • America’s Future
    • Careers
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Contact Us

Subscribe for Updates

Get the latest news and updates from Badger Institute.

What's New

Why should food stamps be forever stamps?

March 30, 2023

Latest crime figures show a Milwaukee in trouble

March 23, 2023

Wisconsin lawmakers in the dark on broadband

March 16, 2023
Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn Instagram
TRENDING:
  • Why should food stamps be forever stamps?
  • Latest crime figures show a Milwaukee in trouble
  • Wisconsin lawmakers in the dark on broadband
  • The underfunded part of Wisconsin public schooling
  • Foreseeing the Future of Wisconsin’s Flat Tax
  • Wisconsin voters will be asked about welfare work requirements
  • A state without convictions
  • Why Wisconsin Needs a Flat Tax and Education Reform
  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Contact
Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn Instagram
Badger InstituteBadger Institute
SUPPORT OUR MISSION
  • Issues
    • Taxes
    • Education
    • Crime & Justice
    • Spending & Accountability
    • Economy & Infrastructure
    • Federalism
    • Licensing
    • Healthcare
    • Civil Society
  • Mandate for Madison
  • Research
  • Magazines
    • Diggings
    • Wisconsin Interest
  • Events
  • Media
    • Podcast
    • Fact Sheets
    • Viewpoints
    • Press Releases
    • Badger in the News
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Testimony
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Board of Directors
    • Team
    • Visiting Fellows
    • America’s Future
    • Careers
Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
DONATE
Badger InstituteBadger Institute
Home » Really Big
Culture/Politics

Really Big

By Badger InstituteNovember 5, 2010
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest

By Stephen F. Hayes

Stephen F. Hayes, a Wauwatosa native, is a senior writer for The Weekly Standard. His books include Cheney: The Untold Story of America’s Most Powerful and Controversial Vice President (HarperCollins).

On Nov. 4, 2008, Barack Obama won 59 of Wisconsin’s 72 counties. He won Wisconsin by 14 points. Two years later, Scott Walker won 60 of those 72 counties. He won Wisconsin by five points. Ron Johnson won by a similar margin.

That’s change.

There are many reasons for the shift. Economic growth is sluggish. Unemployment is high. Health care reform is unpopular. Deficits are growing. Americans loathe Congress. Voters are disgusted by the federal government. The list goes on. The complaints were specific. The frustration was not anti-incumbent, as many in the media and other Obama supporters argued. It was anti-Democratic and anti-big-government.

Much of the country saw a major shift from blue to red. Republicans were elected in districts and states that had not been friendly territory for years, in some cases decades.

Congressman John Spratt (D-S.C.), chair of the House Budget Committee and a survivor of the 1994 Republican Revolution, lost to state Sen. Mick Mulvaney. Congressman Jim Oberstar (D-Minn.), chair of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, had served since 1974, until losing to political neophyte Chip Cravaack.

Many of the most significant Republican victories came in the Midwest, where John Kasich defeated incumbent Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland in a race the White House desperately wanted to win, and Republican Mark Kirk won Barack Obama’s old seat in the U.S. Senate.

But the two biggest victories in Wisconsin — Johnson and Scott Walker — make the Republican gains here among the most significant in the country.

In the case of Ron Johnson, it was how he ran and the Democrat he defeated. Beating Russ Feingold, a liberal icon, immediately makes Johnson an important voice in the Senate Republican caucus. But so does his background.

Johnson is not a lawyer, but a manufacturer — as his brilliant “whiteboard” ad conveyed so effectively. He’s a smart guy, but he’s not a professional politician and has no apparent interest in becoming one. That is a powerful tool in a world where reelection is often the highest priority.

And Johnson might be the purest blend of Tea Party/Republican Party in the coming Congress. His speeches at Tea Party rallies first caught the attention of influential conservatives and the Republican Party of Wisconsin, which, unlike many other state parties in the country, quickly understood the advantages of allying with the various Tea Party groups.

The fact that Johnson is of the Tea Party and in the Republican Party will put him in a position to serve as a bridge between Republican Party leaders in Washington and grassroots conservatives across the country.

Walker’s victory was important for other reasons. Wisconsin is a mess. Taxes are too high, spending is out of control, and Madison is dysfunctional. Walker is a problem solver. He tells people what he plans to do, and, with rare exceptions, he does what he says.

As one prominent Washington-based GOP strategist told me: “Scott’s popularity has less to do with what he’s saying and more to do with what he’s done.” National Republicans from Jeb Bush to Newt Gingrich to Haley Barbour paid careful attention to what Walker did in Milwaukee County.

On Nov.2, some two hours after polls had closed across the state, Walker took a call from Gov. Jim Doyle.

The two men chatted briefly, and Doyle congratulated Walker on his impressive win. “He was very gracious. I thought about asking him to stop the train, but decided it wasn’t probably the best timing,” Walker joked moments after the call ended.

A week later, however, Walker sat down with Doyle, listened to his case for funding the train, and promptly dismissed it. He shrugged off threats to pull the funding from Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood and told me that his inclination was to escalate the fight, not run from it.

This, probably more than anything else, is why Scott Walker was elected governor. Not the train, specifically — though it represented government waste and arrogance in a way that was easy for voters to understand — but Walker’s simple way of talking about it. People don’t want the train. It costs a lot of money. We can’t afford it. I’m going to stop it. Walker’s stripped-down rhetoric is an asset.

There is no question that these two victories — along with Sean Duffy and Reid Ribble winning House seats and the GOP capturing the state Legislature — have once again focused attention on Wisconsin as a swing state in 2012.

Political strategists consider Wisconsin winnable for Republicans and Democrats alike in presidential elections. But it has been a quarter century since a Republican won Wisconsin — Ronald Reagan in 1984.

Could that be changing? Ron Johnson’s vote percentage was the highest for a Republican senatorial candidate since 1956. And Walker, as noted, won 60 of 72 counties. So Wisconsin is in play in 2012.

No surprise, then, that just before Jim Doyle called Walker, he took another call — the first congratulatory call he received. It was presumed 2012 GOP presidential frontrunner Mitt Romney.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Badger Institute

Related Posts

Assembly Speaker calls for tolling to fund Wisconsin infrastructure

March 2, 2023

Foreseeing the Future of Wisconsin’s Flat Tax

March 2, 2023

Another Reason, Governor, to Cut Those Top Tax Rates

February 20, 2023
Categories
Top Posts

Local pols filling old budget holes with massive COVID aid

December 8, 20221,455

This is not four years ago

November 10, 20221,288

A state without convictions

January 12, 2023647

Billions in federal spending in Wisconsin unaudited; results never measured

November 9, 2022493
Archives

Sign Up for Top Picks

Our weekly e-Newsletter with the latest items and updates

Connect with Badger Institute
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
About Us
About Us

The Badger Institute is a nonpartisan, not-for-profit institute established in 1987 working to engage and energize Wisconsinites and others in discussions and timely action on key public policy issues critical to the state’s future, growth and prosperity.

Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube LinkedIn

Sign Up for Top Picks

Our weekly e-Newsletter with the latest items and updates

What’s New

Why should food stamps be forever stamps?

March 30, 2023

Latest crime figures show a Milwaukee in trouble

March 23, 2023

Wisconsin lawmakers in the dark on broadband

March 16, 2023

The underfunded part of Wisconsin public schooling

March 16, 2023
© 2023 Badger Institute | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Sitemap

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

This site uses functional cookies and external scripts to improve your experience.

Privacy settings

Privacy Settings

This site uses functional cookies and external scripts to improve your experience. Which cookies and scripts are used and how they impact your visit is specified on the left. You may change your settings at any time. Your choices will not impact your visit.

NOTE: These settings will only apply to the browser and device you are currently using.

CRM Software

Customer Relationship Management Software

Google Analytics

Google Analytics is a web analytics service offered by Google that tracks and reports website traffic. Google uses the data collected to track and monitor the use of our Service. This data is shared with other Google services. Google may use the collected data to contextualize and personalize the ads of its own advertising network.

You can opt-out of having made your activity on the Service available to Google Analytics by installing the Google Analytics opt-out browser add-on. The add-on prevents the Google Analytics JavaScript (ga.js, analytics.js, and dc.js) from sharing information with Google Analytics about visits activity.

For more information on the privacy practices of Google, please visit the Google Privacy & Terms web page: https://policies.google.com/privacy?hl=en

Powered by Cookie Information