Badger InstituteBadger Institute
  • Home
  • Issues
    • Taxes
    • Education
    • Crime & Justice
    • Spending & Accountability
    • Economy & Infrastructure
    • Licensing
    • Healthcare
    • Civil Society
  • Mandate for Madison
  • Research
  • Magazines
    • Diggings
    • Wisconsin Interest
  • Events
  • Media
    • Podcast
    • Fact Sheets
    • Viewpoints
    • Press Releases
    • Badger in the News
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Testimony
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Board of Directors
    • Team
    • Visiting Fellows
    • America’s Future
    • Careers
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Contact Us

Subscribe for Updates

Get the latest news and updates from Badger Institute.

What's New

Wisconsin lawmakers in the dark on broadband

March 16, 2023

The underfunded part of Wisconsin public schooling

March 16, 2023

If we don’t pay for roads, we don’t get mobility

March 9, 2023
Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn Instagram
TRENDING:
  • Wisconsin lawmakers in the dark on broadband
  • The underfunded part of Wisconsin public schooling
  • If we don’t pay for roads, we don’t get mobility
  • Assembly Speaker calls for tolling to fund Wisconsin infrastructure
  • Foreseeing the Future of Wisconsin’s Flat Tax
  • Amid illiteracy, where was the urgency?
  • Calls to Police from MPS High Schools Up Dramatically Again
  • Wisconsin voters will be asked about welfare work requirements
  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Contact
Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn Instagram
Badger InstituteBadger Institute
SUPPORT OUR MISSION
  • Issues
    • Taxes
    • Education
    • Crime & Justice
    • Spending & Accountability
    • Economy & Infrastructure
    • Licensing
    • Healthcare
    • Civil Society
  • Mandate for Madison
  • Research
  • Magazines
    • Diggings
    • Wisconsin Interest
  • Events
  • Media
    • Podcast
    • Fact Sheets
    • Viewpoints
    • Press Releases
    • Badger in the News
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Testimony
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Board of Directors
    • Team
    • Visiting Fellows
    • America’s Future
    • Careers
Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
DONATE
Badger InstituteBadger Institute
Home » Viewpoints » How you get faster prosecution: Pay for it
Viewpoints

How you get faster prosecution: Pay for it

By Patrick McIlheranOctober 13, 2022
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest

Darrell Brooks Jr.’s trial on six counts of homicide is careening along 10 full months after he was arrested in the Waukesha parade outrage. By the standards of Wisconsin justice, that’s prompt.

It should be another kind of outrage that it now takes, on average, more than 15 months to fully resolve, from arrest to closed case, a homicide charge in Wisconsin. Armed robbery takes a year and sexual assault cases average 14 months. Scholar Jeremiah Mosteller documents these dismal averages in “Toward Swifter Justice,” a study examining the scope and causes of Wisconsin’s court backlogs. It’s part of the Badger Institute’s Mandate for Madison.

Mosteller documents how our courts are getting slower. A felony that took an average of 130 days from charges to sentence in 2003 now takes 241 days, with a sharp turn for the worse after 2018.

And Mosteller documented the reasons. Short version: Prosecutors are overloaded. They’re having a hard time holding on to staff.

“We consistently lose attorneys,” said Kent Lovern, Milwaukee County’s chief deputy district attorney. “The attorneys we lose are those who have been here three, five or seven years, and they are now able to handle complicated felony cases.” Or they would if they didn’t leave for better jobs.

“If we don’t put bodies in the courtroom, that is going to slow down cases,” said Dodge County District Attorney Kurt Klomberg. “It is that simple.”

An answer suggests itself: Put bodies with law degrees into courtrooms so that prosecution may proceed promptly, then pay enough so they stay there after they gain mastery. Mosteller suggests just that. Though, as he put it to WIBA-AM commentator Vicki McKenna, “Money’s going to help, but it’s not going to solve the problem.” Policymakers must find ways of making courts work more efficiently.

But saying that part about more money can set off alarms about throwing cash at dysfunctional operations. Rightly so. More money for John Chisholm? For the Milwaukee County district attorney whose office botched Brooks’ release on bail before the parade outrage and who refused to prosecute what the head of the Milwaukee Police Association last year called a “ridiculously high” share of felony cases?

Yes, more money for that one. And for other DAs in the state. The performance of any particular DA is not an indictment of the ideal of adequate prosecution. So long as Wisconsin elects its DAs, that performance says more about voters’ options and decisions — a separate discussion. The delays Mosteller describes are across jurisdictions, meaning that victims of crimes are delayed in seeing justice and citizens are not seeing as much deterrence as they should, regardless of whom they elected.

And sometimes, yes, the answer is to throw more cash, especially at legitimate functions of government. Think Reagan and the defense budget. Prosecutors provide the domestic equivalent of what the Navy does when it deters foreign threats to our civil order. Funding prosecutors’ work — and that of public defenders, without whom prosecutions cannot proceed — is as legit as local government gets. Arresting criminals means nothing if we can’t prosecute and incarcerate them.

Say what you will about how assistant district attorneys should step up their game, or question as you might the work ethic of prosecutorial staffs. I don’t, and Mosteller’s findings give no support to such complaint, but supposing for a moment that courthouse staffs are just undermotivated and subpar, what is the usual way of improving a workforce in our free-market economy?

We don’t do military-style drafts for talent. Beatings rarely improve morale. Instead, if you feel you need a better staff, you attract one. You pay more, and you fund an adequate number of colleagues to prevent burnout. Welcome to capitalism.

There’s evidence that prosecutorial and public defense staffs are talented and motivated, seeing as they’re lured away by better opportunities.

Just listen to the current head of the Wisconsin District Attorneys Association, who concisely made the case for better staff pay on a recent late-afternoon show on Milwaukee’s conservative talk-radio powerhouse, WISN-AM:

“We’ve got so many great prosecutors across Wisconsin that are working tirelessly to keep our communities safe,” said that DA, Fond du Lac County’s Eric Toney. “And many of them do it for very low pay, with a starting salary at $54,000.”

Toney is running for Wisconsin attorney general against the incumbent Josh Kaul, who has called for more “community prosecutors” and two new prosecutors in his own office. While the Badger Institute stays out of politicking, Toney’s comments are notable because he’s taking a traditional tough-on-crime approach and clearly sees better prosecutor funding as part of it.

Talking to host Kevin Nicholson, he put the proposition this way: “It becomes a difficult decision for someone to make coming out of law school to say, ‘I want to make $54,000,’ even though they may have a passion to be a prosecutor.”

Thus, he and his association are pushing for adequate state support of that part of law-and-order that comes right after the arrest.

The Badger Institute is pleased to explain to Wisconsin what those DAs are referring to.

Patrick McIlheran is the Director of Policy at the Badger Institute. Permission to reprint is granted as long as the author and Badger Institute are properly cited

News
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Patrick McIlheran

Related Posts

Wisconsin lawmakers in the dark on broadband

March 16, 2023

The underfunded part of Wisconsin public schooling

March 16, 2023

If we don’t pay for roads, we don’t get mobility

March 9, 2023
Categories
Top Posts

Local pols filling old budget holes with massive COVID aid

December 8, 20221,447

This is not four years ago

November 10, 20221,283

A state without convictions

January 12, 2023643

Billions in federal spending in Wisconsin unaudited; results never measured

November 9, 2022484
Archives

Sign Up for Top Picks

Our weekly e-Newsletter with the latest items and updates

Connect with Badger Institute
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
About Us
About Us

The Badger Institute is a nonpartisan, not-for-profit institute established in 1987 working to engage and energize Wisconsinites and others in discussions and timely action on key public policy issues critical to the state’s future, growth and prosperity.

Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube LinkedIn

Sign Up for Top Picks

Our weekly e-Newsletter with the latest items and updates

What’s New

Wisconsin lawmakers in the dark on broadband

March 16, 2023

The underfunded part of Wisconsin public schooling

March 16, 2023

If we don’t pay for roads, we don’t get mobility

March 9, 2023

Assembly Speaker calls for tolling to fund Wisconsin infrastructure

March 2, 2023
© 2023 Badger Institute | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Sitemap

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

This site uses functional cookies and external scripts to improve your experience.

Privacy settings

Privacy Settings

This site uses functional cookies and external scripts to improve your experience. Which cookies and scripts are used and how they impact your visit is specified on the left. You may change your settings at any time. Your choices will not impact your visit.

NOTE: These settings will only apply to the browser and device you are currently using.

CRM Software

Customer Relationship Management Software

Google Analytics

Google Analytics is a web analytics service offered by Google that tracks and reports website traffic. Google uses the data collected to track and monitor the use of our Service. This data is shared with other Google services. Google may use the collected data to contextualize and personalize the ads of its own advertising network.

You can opt-out of having made your activity on the Service available to Google Analytics by installing the Google Analytics opt-out browser add-on. The add-on prevents the Google Analytics JavaScript (ga.js, analytics.js, and dc.js) from sharing information with Google Analytics about visits activity.

For more information on the privacy practices of Google, please visit the Google Privacy & Terms web page: https://policies.google.com/privacy?hl=en

Powered by Cookie Information