Close Menu
Badger InstituteBadger Institute
  • Home
  • Issues
    • Taxes
    • Education
    • Housing
    • Crime & Justice
    • Spending & Accountability
    • Economy & Infrastructure
    • Federalism
    • Licensing
    • Healthcare
    • Childcare
    • Marijuana
    • Energy
    • Civil Society
  • Mandate for Madison
  • Research
  • News & Analysis
    • News & Analysis
    • Viewpoints (Op-ed)
    • By the Numbers
    • Fact Sheets
    • Magazines
      • Diggings
      • Wisconsin Interest
  • Media
    • Badger in the News
    • Press Releases
    • Podcast
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Testimony
  • Events
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Board of Directors
    • Team
    • Visiting Fellows
    • Careers
  • Top Picks
  • Donate
  • Contact Us

Subscribe to Top Picks

Get the latest news and research from Badger Institute

Name(Required)
You can modify your subscription preferences at any time by using the link found at the bottom of every email.

What's New

At center of America’s essential debate, Johnson says resist spending frenzy

June 5, 2025

Real answer to siting nuclear plants: ‘Yes, here.’

June 5, 2025

Taxpayers need more simplicity and transparency — not misleading arguments meant to stoke fears of successful choice schools

May 29, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn Instagram
TRENDING:
  • At center of America’s essential debate, Johnson says resist spending frenzy
  • Real answer to siting nuclear plants: ‘Yes, here.’
  • Taxpayers need more simplicity and transparency — not misleading arguments meant to stoke fears of successful choice schools
  • Plans, zoning and annexation form front lines for Wisconsin cities looking to build more housing
  • We increasingly live in a world of unsolved crime
  • State should cut funding to public media
  • Kewaunee power possibility adds to Wisconsin nuclear trend
  • Taxpayers spared nearly $8.5 million in Wisconsin alone due to Trump administration order cutting aid to public broadcasting
  • Donate
  • Events
  • Contact
Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn Instagram
Badger InstituteBadger Institute
SUPPORT OUR MISSION
  • Issues
    • Taxes
    • Education
    • Housing
    • Crime & Justice
    • Spending & Accountability
    • Economy & Infrastructure
    • Federalism
    • Licensing
    • Healthcare
    • Childcare
    • Marijuana
    • Energy
    • Civil Society
  • Mandate for Madison
  • Research
  • News & Analysis
    • News & Analysis
    • Viewpoints (Op-ed)
    • By the Numbers
    • Fact Sheets
    • Magazines
      • Diggings
      • Wisconsin Interest
  • Media
    • Press Releases
    • Badger in the News
    • Podcast
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Testimony
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Board of Directors
    • Team
    • Visiting Fellows
    • Careers
Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
DONATE
Badger InstituteBadger Institute
Home » Media » News & Analysis » Study counts the cost of ‘free’ federal money
Economy and Infastructure

Study counts the cost of ‘free’ federal money

By Dan BensonFebruary 3, 2016
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest

About one-third of all state spending today originates in Washington, D.C., dramatically increasing the influence of the federal government on state spending priorities.

His hometown’s experience with a federally funded streetcar project, which is considered a model for Milwaukee’s streetcar, prompted a Portland State University economics professor to look at how much “free” federal grant money actually costs taxpayers.

Eric Fruits reviewed 40 years’ worth of federal grants in aid to states and found that for every dollar received through federal grants, it costs state and local taxpayers about 82 cents, on average, in additional taxes and fees. For Wisconsin taxpayers, it’s even more, paying about $1.34 per federal dollar.

In the study, titled “Impact of Federal Transfers on State and Local Own-Source Spending,” Fruits reviewed federal grants to states from 1972 through 2012 and found that as grant awards have increased, so has state and local spending.

“Each additional dollar in federal transfers is associated with an increase in state and local taxes and fees of 74-88 cents,” Fruits writes in his report. Fruits also is president of Economics International Corp., a Portland-based consulting firm.

Fruits doesn’t offer an explanation of why Wisconsinites pay more than other states. But he says increased spending from states — which includes municipalities, schools, public colleges, as well as state government — primarily follows federal grants in two ways:

  • Federal grants often require a matching amount, usually in the form of new spending, from the local/state agency that is receiving the money.
  • The state or local agency is saddled with a “maintenance of effort” responsibility, such as maintaining a new road or paying staff to administer the new program or project once the federal money is spent.

The influence of federal dollars on state and local spending has grown exponentially, from $74 billion in 1980 to almost $300 billion in 2012, the most recent data available, Fruits says in his study. As a result, about one-third of all state spending today originates in Washington, D.C., dramatically increasing the influence of the federal government on state spending priorities, he says.

Interest in the effects of federal grant money on state and local finances has increased in recent years with the implementation of the massive American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, or Stimulus, that began in 2008-2009 and which pumped more than $800 billion into state economies, and the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, which stands to expand Medicaid payments to states in coming years.

 “Our results suggest that the increases in federal grants to state and local governments associated with the ACA’s Medicaid expansion will have significant future tax implications at the state and local level as these governments raise revenue to continue, expand and promote these newly funded programs into the future and as federal support tapers off once the expansion is in place,” Fruits says in his report.

Ironically, Fruits was driven to complete his study partly because of Portland’s downtown streetcar project — generally a model for other cities, such as Milwaukee, considering building a similar system. Portland’s was built initially with the help of a federal grant but now carries an annual operating budget deficit of $4.5 million, forcing the city to divert funds from road repair and maintenance and to consider imposing a 4-cent-per-gallon gas tax to help pay for it.

“Without the federal funds, Portland wouldn’t have a streetcar, which means it would have millions more for road repairs and maintenance, which means it wouldn’t need millions in new taxes to fund road repairs and maintenance. Who would have thought that free federal money could be so expensive?” Fruits said in a telephone interview.

Dan Benson is editor of WPRI’s Project for 21st Century Federalism.

News
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Dan Benson

Related Posts

At center of America’s essential debate, Johnson says resist spending frenzy

June 5, 2025

Real answer to siting nuclear plants: ‘Yes, here.’

June 5, 2025

Taxpayers need more simplicity and transparency — not misleading arguments meant to stoke fears of successful choice schools

May 29, 2025
Top Posts

‘Predictable’ Hobart a rarity for developers in Wisconsin

March 20, 20251,903

Policy Brief: Could Wisconsin eliminate its income tax?

September 12, 20241,827

Manitowoc and builder bend to make houses attainable

April 24, 20251,424

Subject by subject, Wisconsin districts face higher rates of teacher turnover

May 1, 20251,040

Top Picks

Subscribe for the latest news and research from Badger Institute

Name(Required)
You can modify your subscription preferences at any time by using the link found at the bottom of every email.

Connect with Badger Institute
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
About Us
About Us

The Badger Institute is a nonpartisan, not-for-profit institute established in 1987 working to engage and energize Wisconsinites and others in discussions and timely action on key public policy issues critical to the state’s future, growth and prosperity.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn

Sign up for Top Picks

Get the latest news and research from Badger Institute

Name(Required)
You can modify your subscription preferences at any time by using the link found at the bottom of every email.

What’s New

At center of America’s essential debate, Johnson says resist spending frenzy

June 5, 2025

Real answer to siting nuclear plants: ‘Yes, here.’

June 5, 2025

Taxpayers need more simplicity and transparency — not misleading arguments meant to stoke fears of successful choice schools

May 29, 2025

Plans, zoning and annexation form front lines for Wisconsin cities looking to build more housing

May 22, 2025
© 2025 Badger Institute | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Sitemap

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Notifications