Close Menu
Badger InstituteBadger Institute
  • Home
  • Issues
    • Taxes
    • Education
    • Housing
    • Crime & Justice
    • Spending & Accountability
    • Economy & Infrastructure
    • Federalism
    • Licensing
    • Healthcare
    • Childcare
    • Marijuana
    • Energy
    • Civil Society
  • Mandate for Madison
  • Research
  • News & Analysis
    • News & Analysis
    • Viewpoints (Op-ed)
    • By the Numbers
    • Fact Sheets
    • Magazines
      • Diggings
      • Wisconsin Interest
  • Media
    • Badger in the News
    • Press Releases
    • Podcast
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Testimony
  • Events
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Board of Directors
    • Team
    • Visiting Fellows
    • Careers
  • Top Picks
  • Donate
  • Contact Us

Subscribe to Top Picks

Get the latest news and research from Badger Institute

Name(Required)
You can modify your subscription preferences at any time by using the link found at the bottom of every email.

What's New

State should cut funding to public media

May 15, 2025

Kewaunee power possibility adds to Wisconsin nuclear trend

May 15, 2025

Taxpayers spared nearly $8.5 million in Wisconsin alone due to Trump administration order cutting aid to public broadcasting

May 8, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn Instagram
TRENDING:
  • State should cut funding to public media
  • Kewaunee power possibility adds to Wisconsin nuclear trend
  • Taxpayers spared nearly $8.5 million in Wisconsin alone due to Trump administration order cutting aid to public broadcasting
  • Local government regulations push price of a Wisconsin roof skyward
  • Subject by subject, Wisconsin districts face higher rates of teacher turnover
  • Milwaukee rents in national spotlight; rent caps not the solution  
  • Gov. Evers’ irresponsible budget
  • Manitowoc and builder bend to make houses attainable
  • Donate
  • Events
  • Contact
Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn Instagram
Badger InstituteBadger Institute
SUPPORT OUR MISSION
  • Issues
    • Taxes
    • Education
    • Housing
    • Crime & Justice
    • Spending & Accountability
    • Economy & Infrastructure
    • Federalism
    • Licensing
    • Healthcare
    • Childcare
    • Marijuana
    • Energy
    • Civil Society
  • Mandate for Madison
  • Research
  • News & Analysis
    • News & Analysis
    • Viewpoints (Op-ed)
    • By the Numbers
    • Fact Sheets
    • Magazines
      • Diggings
      • Wisconsin Interest
  • Media
    • Press Releases
    • Badger in the News
    • Podcast
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Testimony
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Board of Directors
    • Team
    • Visiting Fellows
    • Careers
Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
DONATE
Badger InstituteBadger Institute
Home » Energy » Governor keeps alive possibility of local bans on fossil fuels
Energy

Governor keeps alive possibility of local bans on fossil fuels

By Badger InstituteAugust 10, 2023
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest

Gov. Tony Evers, whose goal is that “all electricity consumed in the state be 100% carbon-free by 2050,” is making sure that state agencies and local governments are able to ban the use of fossil fuels to run cars and lawnmowers, heat homes and power stoves.

Gas stove subject to potential ban after Wisconsin governor’s veto

That’s the practical effect of his vetoes of three Republican-backed bills — AB141, AB142 and SB49 — that would have prohibited such bans.

His veto messages suggested that banning fossil fuels in a state where almost 80% of homes are directly heated with them and the vast majority of cars still use gas could make it “easier, not harder, for our state to meet the needs of a 21st-century infrastructure, workforce and economy.”

He didn’t attempt to explain how that could be the case.

Climate Change

The bills, the governor also wrote in one of his veto messages, would “diminish our collective ability to help combat climate change.”

The American Petroleum Institute is among the groups that supported AB141 and AB142 and also supports “global action that drives greenhouse gas emissions reductions and economic development,” a recent Badger Institute piece noted.

While the costs of bans on fossil fuels would be confined to residents of local areas or the state, impacts on the climate — which can be the result of either natural forces or human actions — would be difficult to ascertain and mitigated by global realities.

Carbon dioxide emissions in the United States decreased by 2% between 1990 and 2021, according to the EPA. Since 1990, global CO₂ emissions have increased by more than 60 percent, according to Statista.

That hasn’t prevented other states from passing restrictions.

What Some Other States Are Doing

As we noted in a recent policy brief:

  • California is banning the sale of all new natural gas-fired space heaters and water heaters by 2030, via its building code.   
  • Washington state is in effect banning gas for home heating and water heating while permitting it for stoves, via its building code.  
  • Colorado law now requires gas utilities must come up with “clean heat” plans to cut “greenhouse gas” emissions by 22% under 2015’s level by 2030. Utilities regulators decreed that all costs for gas network improvements be loaded onto new developments, amounting to a “de facto ban” on new hookups, said Xcel Energy. 
  • Maryland in 2022 enacted law calling for a 60% reduction in “greenhouse gas” by 2031.  

Nationwide, meanwhile, 147 local governments have some kind of “decarbonization” ordinance or rule, according to Building Decarbonization Coalition, a group of utilities, government agencies and HVAC manufacturers.

Submit a comment

"*" indicates required fields

Your name*

News
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Badger Institute

Related Posts

Kewaunee power possibility adds to Wisconsin nuclear trend

May 15, 2025

Taxpayers spared nearly $8.5 million in Wisconsin alone due to Trump administration order cutting aid to public broadcasting

May 8, 2025

Local government regulations push price of a Wisconsin roof skyward

May 8, 2025
Top Posts

Emergency responders can’t find a place to live close to where they save lives

March 6, 20252,375

‘Predictable’ Hobart a rarity for developers in Wisconsin

March 20, 20251,822

Policy Brief: Could Wisconsin eliminate its income tax?

September 12, 20241,676

For now, a tiny house in a land of lakes and giant prices

February 20, 20251,500

Top Picks

Subscribe for the latest news and research from Badger Institute

Name(Required)
You can modify your subscription preferences at any time by using the link found at the bottom of every email.

Connect with Badger Institute
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
About Us
About Us

The Badger Institute is a nonpartisan, not-for-profit institute established in 1987 working to engage and energize Wisconsinites and others in discussions and timely action on key public policy issues critical to the state’s future, growth and prosperity.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn

Sign up for Top Picks

Get the latest news and research from Badger Institute

Name(Required)
You can modify your subscription preferences at any time by using the link found at the bottom of every email.

What’s New

State should cut funding to public media

May 15, 2025

Kewaunee power possibility adds to Wisconsin nuclear trend

May 15, 2025

Taxpayers spared nearly $8.5 million in Wisconsin alone due to Trump administration order cutting aid to public broadcasting

May 8, 2025

Local government regulations push price of a Wisconsin roof skyward

May 8, 2025
© 2025 Badger Institute | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Sitemap

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Notifications