Badger InstituteBadger Institute
  • Home
  • Issues
    • Taxes
    • Education
    • Crime & Justice
    • Spending & Accountability
    • Economy & Infrastructure
    • Federalism
    • Licensing
    • Healthcare
    • Civil Society
  • Mandate for Madison
  • Research
  • Magazines
    • Diggings
    • Wisconsin Interest
  • Events
  • Media
    • Podcast
    • Fact Sheets
    • Viewpoints
    • Press Releases
    • Badger in the News
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Testimony
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Board of Directors
    • Team
    • Visiting Fellows
    • America’s Future
    • Careers
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Contact Us

Subscribe for Updates

Get the latest news and updates from Badger Institute.

What's New

Why should food stamps be forever stamps?

March 30, 2023

Latest crime figures show a Milwaukee in trouble

March 23, 2023

Wisconsin lawmakers in the dark on broadband

March 16, 2023
Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn Instagram
TRENDING:
  • Why should food stamps be forever stamps?
  • Latest crime figures show a Milwaukee in trouble
  • Wisconsin lawmakers in the dark on broadband
  • The underfunded part of Wisconsin public schooling
  • Foreseeing the Future of Wisconsin’s Flat Tax
  • Wisconsin voters will be asked about welfare work requirements
  • A state without convictions
  • Why Wisconsin Needs a Flat Tax and Education Reform
  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Contact
Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn Instagram
Badger InstituteBadger Institute
SUPPORT OUR MISSION
  • Issues
    • Taxes
    • Education
    • Crime & Justice
    • Spending & Accountability
    • Economy & Infrastructure
    • Federalism
    • Licensing
    • Healthcare
    • Civil Society
  • Mandate for Madison
  • Research
  • Magazines
    • Diggings
    • Wisconsin Interest
  • Events
  • Media
    • Podcast
    • Fact Sheets
    • Viewpoints
    • Press Releases
    • Badger in the News
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Testimony
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Board of Directors
    • Team
    • Visiting Fellows
    • America’s Future
    • Careers
Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
DONATE
Badger InstituteBadger Institute
Home » Tough Challenges Ahead
Economy and Infastructure

Tough Challenges Ahead

By Badger InstituteNovember 5, 2011
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest

For conservatives, just saying ‘no’ probably won’t be enough to solve our state’s and nation’s problems

By Richard Esenberg

The Walker administration has come, it has seen and, at least so far, it has conquered. As I argued in my last column here, the governor managed to achieve traditional conservative objectives (lower taxing and spending) without corresponding service reductions.

What’s next?

This is a complicated question. Conservatives don’t believe that government is the measure of the state or that the improvement of our lot turns on whatever it does or fails to do. Those who compare the buoyant rhetoric of Ronald Reagan and Barack Obama often fail to recognize that they were celebrating very different things. Reagan believed in the genius of the people acting as individuals and voluntary associations. For Obama, “we the people” is more likely to be seen as a collective expressing its will though politics and government.

For conservatives, a politician’s pre-eminent virtue is humility. He must not become enamored of his ability to “create” jobs, fertilize industries or, in the words of Eric Voegelin, “immanentize the eschaton.” We don’t expect our political leaders to heal the sick, cool the planet or cause the waters to recede. We subscribe to the maxim: First, do no harm.

Having said that, conservatives cannot expect — or want — the state to wither away. Belief in free markets, individual liberty and a robust civil society does not imply the absence of government. We are facing a difficult political time in which our instincts may be to “just say no,” but exigencies may require more.

As we move into the 2012 election cycle, it is unlikely to be “Morning in America” either in Wisconsin or elsewhere. The economy remains sluggish, and the housing collapse burdens the lives of millions of Americans in a way that little else has in the postwar era.

Just about every tool in the liberal arsenal — stimulus, industrial policy and tax preferences — has failed. Absent a dramatic and unforeseen turnaround, there is no prospect for the president to win re-election on his record.

He knows this and having lost the opportunity for Clintonian triangulation by believing (incorrectly) that he had a mandate to move the country to the left, he has decided to double down, declaring — in fact embracing — class warfare.

Much of this is incoherent. While the president calls for more taxes on the rich, he extends those increases to people who make as little as $200,000 — comfortable to be sure, but hardly the wealth of Croesus. He argues that “millionaires and billionaires” should pay as much as the rest of us, despite Internal Revenue Service statistics showing that they pay more, both absolutely and as a percentage of income.

For those few high earners who do not, he calls for the closing of “loopholes,” but identifies precious few that he actually opposes. The president calls for “the rich” to close the budget deficit, when “simple math” makes clear that this is not possible.

We have heard much the same here in Wisconsin, where relatively modest reductions in compensation for relatively well-paid public employees were castigated as a “war on the middle class,” as if middle-income Wisconsinites don’t pay taxes.

But to call all of this wrong is not to say that it will be ineffective. Just as crisis brings opportunity, it also calls for a scapegoat. The idea that someone else can be blamed for — and expected to rectify — tough times is attractive. Politicians become demagogues for a reason.

Conservatives ignore this at their peril. So, for starters, while we abjure increases in tax rates, conservatives ought to support rationalizing the tax code and eliminating tax preferences. As Paul Ryan’s “Roadmap” has shown, our approach to entitlement reform should favor middle- and lower- income people over wealthier recipients.
As we address economic stagnation, we should avoid crony capitalism and bailouts.

Our emphasis should be on encouraging — rather than directing — initiative. The Walker reforms managed, in part, to skirt the traditional reductionism of more versus less funding by emphasizing efficiency and allowing local units of government to do the same with less.

Those reforms should serve as a model. If, for example, access to post- secondary education is a problem, we may want to emphasize efficiency and cost reduction rather than simply increasing financial aid to students — a tactic that has arguably done more to increase the cost of higher education than it has to improve access.

Although George W. Bush mismanaged the concept of compassionate conservative and the promotion of an ownership society, both are worthy concepts.

One of the toughest nuts to crack in the coming year will be the housing crisis. A country in which large numbers of households are stuck with mortgages exceeding the value of their homes is going to lack economic vitality. Unwinding this is going to require pain and may be one of those cases in which government is going to have to ameliorate the consequences of capitalism’s creative destruction.

All of this is more evocative than prescriptive. We have some thinking to do. And not much time to do it.

Richard Esenberg is president of the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty and an adjunct professor of law at Marquette University. He blogs at sharkandshepherd.blogspot.com

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Badger Institute

Related Posts

Assembly Speaker calls for tolling to fund Wisconsin infrastructure

March 2, 2023

Foreseeing the Future of Wisconsin’s Flat Tax

March 2, 2023

Another Reason, Governor, to Cut Those Top Tax Rates

February 20, 2023
Categories
Top Posts

Local pols filling old budget holes with massive COVID aid

December 8, 20221,455

This is not four years ago

November 10, 20221,288

A state without convictions

January 12, 2023647

Billions in federal spending in Wisconsin unaudited; results never measured

November 9, 2022493
Archives

Sign Up for Top Picks

Our weekly e-Newsletter with the latest items and updates

Connect with Badger Institute
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
About Us
About Us

The Badger Institute is a nonpartisan, not-for-profit institute established in 1987 working to engage and energize Wisconsinites and others in discussions and timely action on key public policy issues critical to the state’s future, growth and prosperity.

Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube LinkedIn

Sign Up for Top Picks

Our weekly e-Newsletter with the latest items and updates

What’s New

Why should food stamps be forever stamps?

March 30, 2023

Latest crime figures show a Milwaukee in trouble

March 23, 2023

Wisconsin lawmakers in the dark on broadband

March 16, 2023

The underfunded part of Wisconsin public schooling

March 16, 2023
© 2023 Badger Institute | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Sitemap

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

This site uses functional cookies and external scripts to improve your experience.

Privacy settings

Privacy Settings

This site uses functional cookies and external scripts to improve your experience. Which cookies and scripts are used and how they impact your visit is specified on the left. You may change your settings at any time. Your choices will not impact your visit.

NOTE: These settings will only apply to the browser and device you are currently using.

CRM Software

Customer Relationship Management Software

Google Analytics

Google Analytics is a web analytics service offered by Google that tracks and reports website traffic. Google uses the data collected to track and monitor the use of our Service. This data is shared with other Google services. Google may use the collected data to contextualize and personalize the ads of its own advertising network.

You can opt-out of having made your activity on the Service available to Google Analytics by installing the Google Analytics opt-out browser add-on. The add-on prevents the Google Analytics JavaScript (ga.js, analytics.js, and dc.js) from sharing information with Google Analytics about visits activity.

For more information on the privacy practices of Google, please visit the Google Privacy & Terms web page: https://policies.google.com/privacy?hl=en

Powered by Cookie Information