Close Menu
Badger InstituteBadger Institute
  • Home
  • Issues
    • Taxes
    • Education
    • Housing
    • Crime & Justice
    • Spending & Accountability
    • Economy & Infrastructure
    • Federalism
    • Licensing
    • Healthcare
    • Childcare
    • Marijuana
    • Energy
    • Civil Society
  • Mandate for Madison
  • Research
  • News & Analysis
    • News & Analysis
    • Viewpoints (Op-ed)
    • By the Numbers
    • Fact Sheets
    • Magazines
      • Diggings
      • Wisconsin Interest
  • Media
    • Badger in the News
    • Press Releases
    • Podcast
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Testimony
  • Events
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Board of Directors
    • Team
    • Visiting Fellows
    • Careers
  • Top Picks
  • Donate
  • Contact Us

Subscribe to Top Picks

Get the latest news and research from Badger Institute

Name(Required)
You can modify your subscription preferences at any time by using the link found at the bottom of every email.

What's New

State should cut funding to public media

May 15, 2025

Kewaunee power possibility adds to Wisconsin nuclear trend

May 15, 2025

Taxpayers spared nearly $8.5 million in Wisconsin alone due to Trump administration order cutting aid to public broadcasting

May 8, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn Instagram
TRENDING:
  • State should cut funding to public media
  • Kewaunee power possibility adds to Wisconsin nuclear trend
  • Taxpayers spared nearly $8.5 million in Wisconsin alone due to Trump administration order cutting aid to public broadcasting
  • Local government regulations push price of a Wisconsin roof skyward
  • Subject by subject, Wisconsin districts face higher rates of teacher turnover
  • Milwaukee rents in national spotlight; rent caps not the solution  
  • Gov. Evers’ irresponsible budget
  • Manitowoc and builder bend to make houses attainable
  • Donate
  • Events
  • Contact
Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn Instagram
Badger InstituteBadger Institute
SUPPORT OUR MISSION
  • Issues
    • Taxes
    • Education
    • Housing
    • Crime & Justice
    • Spending & Accountability
    • Economy & Infrastructure
    • Federalism
    • Licensing
    • Healthcare
    • Childcare
    • Marijuana
    • Energy
    • Civil Society
  • Mandate for Madison
  • Research
  • News & Analysis
    • News & Analysis
    • Viewpoints (Op-ed)
    • By the Numbers
    • Fact Sheets
    • Magazines
      • Diggings
      • Wisconsin Interest
  • Media
    • Press Releases
    • Badger in the News
    • Podcast
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Testimony
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Board of Directors
    • Team
    • Visiting Fellows
    • Careers
Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
DONATE
Badger InstituteBadger Institute
Home » Safety Net » Work requirement waivers increased FoodShare caseloads and costs in Wisconsin
Safety Net

Work requirement waivers increased FoodShare caseloads and costs in Wisconsin

By Badger InstituteOctober 17, 2024
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest

There are ways to reverse the damage state policies did

Employment plays a crucial role in helping families escape poverty and move up the income ladder. The Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program, created through welfare reform in 1996, showed that linking government assistance to work could increase employment and decrease poverty among single-mother families.

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, commonly known as food stamps, also contains a work requirement. In this report, Badger Institute Visiting Fellow Angela Rachidi explores how its usefulness has been blunted.

 Able-bodied adults without dependent children — abbreviated as ABAWDs — can receive SNAP benefits for only three months in a three-year period unless they worked or participated in a work-like activity for 80 hours on average per month.

This requirement, however, has been far from absolute. Federal lawmakers allowed states to waive it in certain circumstances, and Wisconsin officials have done so much of the time.

The result has been higher FoodShare caseloads and expenditures, likely leading to less employment and more government dependency.

Read the policy report

Here, Rachidi analyzes FoodShare data from 2012 to 2023. Her results suggest that waiving the work requirement led to an increase of 780 adults receiving FoodShare on average per county per month during this time — approximately 56,160 more FoodShare adults across the state.

What can Wisconsin do? Rachidi recommends this:

  • Fully implement the federal ABAWD work requirement in Wisconsin without exception by passing a law barring the Wisconsin Department of Health Services from applying for ABAWD waivers.
  • And fully fund and enforce a 2017 Wisconsin law that requires all non-elderly, able-bodied FoodShare adult recipients who aren’t caring for children to work or take part in a training program.

Rachidi’s paper builds on her earlier work for the Badger Institute in continuing and strengthening Wisconsin’s history of innovation in welfare reform. Some highlights of that work include:

  • A look at the slow rebound in employment after the pandemic, and the role government income support programs played.
  • A chapter in our “Mandate for Madison” policy workbook in which Rachidi outlined how waivers in federal requirements on welfare programs could allow Wisconsin to innovate work-encouraging and family-supporting changes.
  • Testimony to the Wisconsin Legislature on the benefits of work requirements in FoodShare.

More of her work for the Badger Institute can be found here.

Work requirements in wisconsin’s foodshare program

Any use or reproduction of Badger Institute articles or photographs requires prior written permission. To request permission to post articles on a website or print copies for distribution, contact Badger Institute President Mike Nichols at mike@badgerinstitute.org or 262-389-8239.

Submit a comment

"*" indicates required fields

Your name*

Reports Trending
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Badger Institute

Related Posts

Subject by subject, Wisconsin districts face higher rates of teacher turnover

May 1, 2025

Milwaukee rents in national spotlight; rent caps not the solution  

May 1, 2025

Federal prosecutors in Madison have stopped prosecuting cannabis offenses

April 17, 2025
Top Posts

Emergency responders can’t find a place to live close to where they save lives

March 6, 20252,371

‘Predictable’ Hobart a rarity for developers in Wisconsin

March 20, 20251,819

For now, a tiny house in a land of lakes and giant prices

February 20, 20251,498

Policy Brief: Could Wisconsin eliminate its income tax?

September 12, 20241,380

Top Picks

Subscribe for the latest news and research from Badger Institute

Name(Required)
You can modify your subscription preferences at any time by using the link found at the bottom of every email.

Connect with Badger Institute
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
About Us
About Us

The Badger Institute is a nonpartisan, not-for-profit institute established in 1987 working to engage and energize Wisconsinites and others in discussions and timely action on key public policy issues critical to the state’s future, growth and prosperity.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn

Sign up for Top Picks

Get the latest news and research from Badger Institute

Name(Required)
You can modify your subscription preferences at any time by using the link found at the bottom of every email.

What’s New

State should cut funding to public media

May 15, 2025

Kewaunee power possibility adds to Wisconsin nuclear trend

May 15, 2025

Taxpayers spared nearly $8.5 million in Wisconsin alone due to Trump administration order cutting aid to public broadcasting

May 8, 2025

Local government regulations push price of a Wisconsin roof skyward

May 8, 2025
© 2025 Badger Institute | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Sitemap

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Notifications