Badger InstituteBadger Institute
  • Home
  • Issues
    • Taxes
    • Education
    • Crime & Justice
    • Spending & Accountability
    • Economy & Infrastructure
    • Federalism
    • Licensing
    • Healthcare
    • Civil Society
  • Mandate for Madison
  • Research
  • Magazines
    • Diggings
    • Wisconsin Interest
  • Events
  • Media
    • Podcast
    • Fact Sheets
    • Viewpoints
    • Press Releases
    • Badger in the News
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Testimony
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Board of Directors
    • Team
    • Visiting Fellows
    • America’s Future
    • Careers
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Contact Us

Subscribe for Updates

Get the latest news and updates from Badger Institute.

What's New

Latest crime figures show a Milwaukee in trouble

March 23, 2023

Wisconsin lawmakers in the dark on broadband

March 16, 2023

The underfunded part of Wisconsin public schooling

March 16, 2023
Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn Instagram
TRENDING:
  • Latest crime figures show a Milwaukee in trouble
  • Wisconsin lawmakers in the dark on broadband
  • The underfunded part of Wisconsin public schooling
  • If we don’t pay for roads, we don’t get mobility
  • Foreseeing the Future of Wisconsin’s Flat Tax
  • Wisconsin voters will be asked about welfare work requirements
  • A state without convictions
  • Why Wisconsin Needs a Flat Tax and Education Reform
  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Contact
Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn Instagram
Badger InstituteBadger Institute
SUPPORT OUR MISSION
  • Issues
    • Taxes
    • Education
    • Crime & Justice
    • Spending & Accountability
    • Economy & Infrastructure
    • Federalism
    • Licensing
    • Healthcare
    • Civil Society
  • Mandate for Madison
  • Research
  • Magazines
    • Diggings
    • Wisconsin Interest
  • Events
  • Media
    • Podcast
    • Fact Sheets
    • Viewpoints
    • Press Releases
    • Badger in the News
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Testimony
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Board of Directors
    • Team
    • Visiting Fellows
    • America’s Future
    • Careers
Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
DONATE
Badger InstituteBadger Institute
Home » Media » Reports » Ending Welfare in Wisconsin
Economy and Infastructure

Ending Welfare in Wisconsin

By Badger InstituteNovember 2, 1994
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest

Sammis White, Ph.D.

The consensus in Wisconsin and the nation is that the current welfare system must be changed. Welfare today neither raises the poor out of poverty nor does it make them any less dependent.  A new approach to welfare must be employed –  one that both reduces poverty and moves recipients, as responsible citizens, into the mainstream of American life. The new welfare approach, unlike the present one, must encourage initiative and independence and be based on the realization that recipients have an obligation to actively strive to achieve that independence.  No longer can the system provide an entitlement for an indefinite period: recipients must provide a quid pro quo; they must reciprocate for the support they are provided. 

The new structure should not be based on any one political ideology. It must be pragmatic. The structure proposed draws ideas from individuals ranging from Milton Friedman to Ralph Nader.  The proposed approach acknowledges that recipients are different individuals, that they should not and cannot all be treated similarly.  It also acknowledges that many recipients are not valued enough in the marketplace so that they can sell their services at a sufficient price to become immediately independent. And it acknowledges that a combination of carrots, sticks, and higher expectations of recipient behavior are critical ingredients in the recipe for a new welfare system.  In short, no single solution will work. What must be employed is a combination of several, coordinated initiatives. 

The proposed structure is based on five principles: 

  1. income support is no longer an entitlement:  recipients owe society for its assistance and must begin to repay society within two years of accepting help; 
  1. the system must include some program elements that treat recipients differently from each other because it is clear that existing and potential recipients will have varying abilities to support themselves; 
  1. known perverse requirements, such as currently making welfare more remunerative than work or setting income guidelines that force recipients to stop working in order to receive any benefits, should be eliminated or greatly reduced in impact; 
  1. all families should be assured of some minimum level of income, as long as they are making the required effort to move toward independence; and, 
  1. the new system must, to the degree possible, help to push low-income participants into mainstream activities, such as work and education, through a series of incentives and opportunities. 

The proposed new structure has three basic components. They are interrelated and form a system that seeks to promote recipient movement from dependence to independence over a limited number of years. 

Cash Grants 

The first major component of the new approach is the substitution of a cash grant to low­ income households in lieu of Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) benefits and Food Stamps.  A new minimum-income program would be established that would create a base level of indefinite period of support. Recipients will be allowed up to two years of assistance on the cash grant. After that. they must either be participating in the Time Dollars volunteer program or be working at least 20 hours a week. If they do neither, their stipend will be reduced by 30% for two additional years, after which they will be ineligible for any public support. The message is similar to another espoused today, “tough love.” Higher expectations of behavior, as research in education has shown, should result in more mainstream behavior. 

Cost Estimates 

If only the current AFDC population were to participate in this program, it would be less expensive than the cost of the AFDC and Food Stamp programs it would replace. The program is likely, however, to appeal to some of those households which are eligible for, but not currently participating in, AFDC. To the degree that they do enroll in this program, they could force program costs above the savings level for the short and possibly intermediate runs. In the long run, the movement of families to work and the reduction in program administrative costs, due to the switch to cash grants, should make serving this population less expensive than the current approach. 

Toe proposed approach has not resolved all of the issues, nor will .it solve all of the problems of welfare. But it would be a significant step forward and a dramatic improvement over the present, failing system.

Vol7No8Download
Reports
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Badger Institute

Related Posts

Assembly Speaker calls for tolling to fund Wisconsin infrastructure

March 2, 2023

Safety Net Fact Sheet

March 2, 2023

Those who pay for pavement set the width

January 26, 2023
Categories
Top Posts

Local pols filling old budget holes with massive COVID aid

December 8, 20221,452

This is not four years ago

November 10, 20221,287

A state without convictions

January 12, 2023645

Billions in federal spending in Wisconsin unaudited; results never measured

November 9, 2022491
Archives

Sign Up for Top Picks

Our weekly e-Newsletter with the latest items and updates

Connect with Badger Institute
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
About Us
About Us

The Badger Institute is a nonpartisan, not-for-profit institute established in 1987 working to engage and energize Wisconsinites and others in discussions and timely action on key public policy issues critical to the state’s future, growth and prosperity.

Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube LinkedIn

Sign Up for Top Picks

Our weekly e-Newsletter with the latest items and updates

What’s New

Latest crime figures show a Milwaukee in trouble

March 23, 2023

Wisconsin lawmakers in the dark on broadband

March 16, 2023

The underfunded part of Wisconsin public schooling

March 16, 2023

If we don’t pay for roads, we don’t get mobility

March 9, 2023
© 2023 Badger Institute | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Sitemap

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

This site uses functional cookies and external scripts to improve your experience.

Privacy settings

Privacy Settings

This site uses functional cookies and external scripts to improve your experience. Which cookies and scripts are used and how they impact your visit is specified on the left. You may change your settings at any time. Your choices will not impact your visit.

NOTE: These settings will only apply to the browser and device you are currently using.

CRM Software

Customer Relationship Management Software

Google Analytics

Google Analytics is a web analytics service offered by Google that tracks and reports website traffic. Google uses the data collected to track and monitor the use of our Service. This data is shared with other Google services. Google may use the collected data to contextualize and personalize the ads of its own advertising network.

You can opt-out of having made your activity on the Service available to Google Analytics by installing the Google Analytics opt-out browser add-on. The add-on prevents the Google Analytics JavaScript (ga.js, analytics.js, and dc.js) from sharing information with Google Analytics about visits activity.

For more information on the privacy practices of Google, please visit the Google Privacy & Terms web page: https://policies.google.com/privacy?hl=en

Powered by Cookie Information